yet received the bamperny's rehly to that li.
alostet ) 24/10.
I 24.10
-A
27th October 1902.
471
Mr. AUSTEN CHAMBERLAIN.-I am aware of the difference in charge to which my hon. friend calls attention. It is in accordance with a well-established principle of the Telegraph Convention that adjoining countries like Russia and China, or Chica and British India, may make arrangements between themselves for Jower rates than those which Budi Hong-kong, as forming the terms of the special
are generally applicable geographically, part of Khirs, has been brought agreements regulating telegraphic rates between China Bad Russia on the one hand, and China and British India on the other. These and other charges have been under the consideration of the Colonial Office and Post Office, and hope that it may be possible to reduce the rate between this country and Hong-kong. I ought to add that the Great Northern Company does not possess a monopoly of landing rights in any British territory.
Done fuj24/00
Dear Johmen
The Postmarker. General
wishes
me to send
yas
the enclosed copy
the answer which to propores to give tomorrow to dis C. Saccoon, in
Colonial affice
the
ea et
have
amy
observations
to make
wpon
بل
In our negotiations with
the Great Northern Telegraph Banpany for
забудь
agreement we shall not overlook the question of the rates they draws to
AL
זי
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.